2019
Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy for Colorectal Neoplasia Detection in Individuals Referred for a Screening Colonoscopy
VOSKA, Michal; Miroslav ZAVORAL; Tomas GREGA; Ondřej MÁJEK; Jan MARTINEK et al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Accuracy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy for Colorectal Neoplasia Detection in Individuals Referred for a Screening Colonoscopy
Autoři
VOSKA, Michal; Miroslav ZAVORAL; Tomas GREGA; Ondřej MÁJEK ORCID; Jan MARTINEK; Ilja TACHECI; Marek BENES; Gabriela VOJTECHOVA; Pavel DRASTICH; Jan BURES; Julius SPICAK; Barbora BUČKOVÁ; Ondřej NGO a Stepan SUCHANEK
Vydání
Gastroenterology Research and Practice, New York, Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 2019, 1687-6121
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30219 Gastroenterology and hepatology
Stát vydavatele
Velká Británie a Severní Irsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 1.806
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/19:00108525
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
Colon Capsule Endoscopy; Colorectal Neoplasia Detection; Screening
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 16. 10. 2019 15:49, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Backround. Capsule colonoscopy might present an alternative to colonoscopy for colorectal neoplasia screening. Aim. To assess the accuracy of second-generation capsule colonoscopy (CCE2) for colorectal neoplasia detection compared with conventional colonoscopy (CC). Methods. From 2011-2015, we performed a multicenter, prospective, cross-over study evaluating the use of CCE2 as a possible colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test based on the assessment of the method's characteristics (accuracy) and safety and patient acceptance of the routine. Enrolled participants fulfilled the CRC screening population criteria if they were asymptomatic, were older than 50, and had no personal or familial history of colorectal neoplasia. The primary outcome was accuracy for the detection of polyps >= 6 mm. Secondary outcomes were accuracy for all polyps, polyps >= 10 mm, adenomas >= 10 mm, and cancers, the quality of bowel cleansing, safety, and CCE2 acceptability by the screening population. Results. A total of 236 individuals were examined; 11 patients (5%) were excluded. Therefore, 225 subjects (95%) were considered in the intention-to-screen (ITS) group. A total of 201 patients (89%) completed both examinations successfully (per protocol group). In the ITS group, polyps were diagnosed during CC in 114 subjects (51%); polyps >= 6 mm, polyps >= 10 mm, and adenomas >= 10 mm were diagnosed in 34 (15%), 16 (7%), and 11 (5%) patients, respectively. The sensitivity of CCE2 for polyps >= 6 mm, polyps >= 10 mm, and adenomas >= 10 mm was 79% (95% confidence interval (CI): 62-91%), 88% (95% CI: 62-98%), and 100% (95% CI: 72-100%), respectively. Conclusion. Second-generation capsule colonoscopy is a safe, noninvasive, and sensitive method for colorectal neoplasia detection although CC remains the preferred method for considerable proportion of subjects. CCE2 may therefore be accepted as the primary screening test for colorectal cancer screening.
Návaznosti
| NV16-29614A, projekt VaV |
|