2020
Platelet-rich plasma, platelet-rich fibrin, and enamel matrix derivative for oral mucosal wound healing
VOKURKA, Jan; Filip HROMČÍK; Martin FALDYNA; Eduard GÖPFERT; Monika VICENOVÁ et al.Základní údaje
Originální název
Platelet-rich plasma, platelet-rich fibrin, and enamel matrix derivative for oral mucosal wound healing
Autoři
VOKURKA, Jan; Filip HROMČÍK ORCID; Martin FALDYNA; Eduard GÖPFERT; Monika VICENOVÁ; Lucie POŽÁROVÁ a Lydie IZAKOVIČOVÁ HOLLÁ
Vydání
Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences, Olsztyn, Polish Academy of Sciences Committee of Veterinary Sciences, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, 2020, 1505-1773
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
30208 Dentistry, oral surgery and medicine
Stát vydavatele
Norsko
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Odkazy
Impakt faktor
Impact factor: 0.821
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14110/20:00115955
Organizační jednotka
Lékařská fakulta
UT WoS
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova česky
plasma bohatá na trombocyty; fibrin bohatý na trombocyty; destičkové koncentráty; hojení ran; orální sliznice; derivát sklovinné matrix
Klíčová slova anglicky
platelet-rich plasma; platelet-rich fibrin; wound healing; dental enamel proteins; artificial membranes
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 3. 8. 2020 08:20, Mgr. Tereza Miškechová
Anotace
V originále
Different approaches to enhance healing of hard or soft tissues include the use of cytokines and growth factors to modify cellular behaviour. Numerous growth factors are found in autologous blood concentrates – platelet rich plasma (PRP) and platelet rich fibrin (PRF). Enamel matrix derivative (EMD) may improve tissue healing via amelogenins. Bilayered collagen matrix (CM) is used for soft tissue augmentation. The aim of the present study was to assess potential benefits of PRP, PRF and EMD in combination with bilayered collagen matrix or CM alone in treatment of oral mucosal defects in rabbits. Twenty-seven New Zealand white rabbits were included in this randomized controlled trial. Artificial oral mucosal defects were treated with one of these five approaches: PRP+CM, PRF+CM, EMD+CM, CM alone, or left untreated as a negative control (CO). The animals were euthanized 1 day, 7 days, or 28 days after surgery and necropsies were harvested. Histological and molecular biological analyses were performed. All defects were healed by day 28. No differences between PRP+CM, PRF+CM, CM alone and CO groups were recorded at any time point. Slower angiogenesis and a higher presence of inflammatory infiltrate were observed in the EMD+CM group 28 days after surgery. Molecular biological analyses did not reveal any statistically significant changes. In conclusion, no improvement in mucosal healing of wounds covered with a collagen membrane and PRP, PRF, or EMD was observed, compared with CM alone or untreated controls.
Návaznosti
| MUNI/A/1428/2019, interní kód MU |
|