p 2021

Coping with the Murder: The Impact of Ján Kuciak’s Assassination on Slovak Investigative Journalists

URBÁNIKOVÁ, Marína

Základní údaje

Originální název

Coping with the Murder: The Impact of Ján Kuciak’s Assassination on Slovak Investigative Journalists

Vydání

The 7th International Conference of the Safety of Journalists in Times of Infodemics (Oslo, Norway), 2021

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Vyžádané přednášky

Obor

50800 5.8 Media and communications

Stát vydavatele

Norsko

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ne

Organizační jednotka

Fakulta sociálních studií

Klíčová slova anglicky

Coping mechanisms; safety and security practices; stress; trauma; violence against journalists; Ján Kuciak; Martina Kušnírová; murder; Slovakia

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam
Změněno: 14. 3. 2022 14:47, Mgr. Blanka Farkašová

Anotace

V originále

In this contribution, using a case-study approach, we focus on the assassination of Ján Kuciak and his fiancée and explore the impact and consequences that it had on the community of investigative journalists in Slovakia. By conducting a series of semi-structured interviews with top investigative journalists (N = 12), we seek to answer two questions: How have they coped with the murder of their colleague? And, how has this incident changed their everyday journalistic practices and routines when it comes to achieving and maintaining safety? We identified 12 coping actions which, based on their function, were organised into five higher order families of coping: emotional purging; sharing and support seeking; avoidance and displacement; defiance and defence; and spreading the legacy and giving meaning to the tragedy. Regarding safety and security practices, the journalists claim that their approach has fundamentally changed. A variety of measures to stay safe, both online and offline, were adopted both on the organisational and on the individual level. However, many of these measures are not used consistently, mostly because they are not deemed necessary when covering non-sensitive topics, but also because of their impracticality in everyday journalistic work, and sceptical and fatalistic approach of the journalists to safety.