2022
Crossing Borders and Period Boundaries in Central European Art : The Work of Anna Lesznai (ca. 1910–1930)
SECKLEHNER, JuliaZákladní údaje
Originální název
Crossing Borders and Period Boundaries in Central European Art : The Work of Anna Lesznai (ca. 1910–1930)
Autoři
Vydání
Oldenbourg, Rethinking Period Boundaries : New Approaches to Continuity and Discontinuity in Modern European History and Culture, od s. 119-148, 30 s. 2022
Nakladatel
De Gruyter
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Kapitola resp. kapitoly v odborné knize
Obor
60401 Arts, Art history
Stát vydavatele
Německo
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Forma vydání
tištěná verze "print"
Odkazy
Označené pro přenos do RIV
Ano
Kód RIV
RIV/00216224:14210/22:00125897
Organizační jednotka
Filozofická fakulta
ISBN
978-3-11-063206-4
EID Scopus
Klíčová slova anglicky
Anna Lesznai; vernacular modernism; periodization; boundaries
Štítky
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 5. 4. 2023 09:11, Mgr. et Mgr. Stanislav Hasil, Ph.D.
Anotace
V originále
The normativisation of art history has a long tradition. From what is widely considered the discipline’s foundational text, Giorgio Vasari’s Lives of the Artists (1550), the history of art has long viewed its subject matter as a lineage in which different stages of development follow each other in a logical succession, according to principles of progress and formal innovation. Key to the establishment of the discipline, this way of periodizing forges categories which, besides referring to particular places in time and space (e.g. Vasari’s ‘Italian Renaissance’), help foreground what makes a given stage of development ‘innovative’ or ‘progressive’ and, thus, worthy of the scholar’s attention. While providing one of the most essential structuring devices for the history of art as a discipline and connecting its internal developments to broader events in social and political history, this system of periodization nonetheless comes with notable flaws. Even though Vasari’s account was recognised as the standard text for studies of the Italian Renaissance for centuries, it was predicated on a clear political-artistic bias: because of the support he received from the Florence-based Medici family, Vasari favoured Florentine painters, most notably Michelangelo, to their non-Florentine counterparts. As is well known, this had far-reaching consequences: while Florence gained a reputation as the cradle of the Renaissance, its rival city Siena was long relegated to secondary status and its artistic production presented as ‘lagging behind’ that of Florence.
Návaznosti
| 786314, interní kód MU |
|