Archetypes  in a Social Representation	of a Dignified Judge 
(Demonstrated on Judge Dee)

k 2022

Archetypes in a Social Representation of a Dignified Judge (Demonstrated on Judge Dee)

ŠTĚPÁNÍKOVÁ, Markéta; Terezie SMEJKALOVÁ a Petr PALÍŠEK

Základní údaje

Originální název

Archetypes in a Social Representation of a Dignified Judge (Demonstrated on Judge Dee)

Autoři

ŠTĚPÁNÍKOVÁ, Markéta ; Terezie SMEJKALOVÁ a Petr PALÍŠEK

Vydání

SLSA Annual Conference, 2022

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Prezentace na konferencích

Obor

50501 Law

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Web konference, Program konference

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Kód RIV

RIV/00216224:14220/22:00129399

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

ethics; legal ethics; lawyers; judges; social representations; vague legal terms

Štítky

rivok

Příznaky

Mezinárodní význam

Změněno: 28. 2. 2023 09:03, Mgr. Petra Georgala

Anotace

V originále

Legal ethics is fast becoming a crucial field of legal research even in continental Europe (eg. Sobek 2019). There is a growing body of literature that recognizes the importance of key legal concepts of legal ethics (eg. Phillips 2016). However, many of these concepts are also vague legal terms. As such, they are usually interpreted and applied theoretically. Yet, for example, the content of the term „dignified judge“ is necessarily determined by the social consensus on what is considered „dignified“ so we need to know this consensus to apply the term correctly. In our long-term project, we have chosen to explore legal concepts by methods of studying their social representations. In this part of our project, we use hierarchical evocation (Abric, 2005) for studying the legal concept of „dignified judge“. This method is a simple production task with a free-association basis. In our research, we collected answers from legal professionals with an emphasis on the judiciary. Results of our research showed that a concept of a dignified judge in the Czech Republic consists of several archetypes. These archetypes can be best demonstrated and explained in the example of Judge Dee (van Gulik). It shows that this particular concept is very similar even in very different cultural backgrounds and even both in art and legal academia.

Návaznosti

GA20-10171S, projekt VaV

Název: Využití metod sociální reprezentace v analýze právních konceptů

Investor: Grantová agentura ČR, Využití metod sociální reprezentace v analýze právních konceptů

Citovat

ŠTĚPÁNÍKOVÁ, Markéta; Terezie SMEJKALOVÁ a Petr PALÍŠEK. Archetypes in a Social Representation of a Dignified Judge (Demonstrated on Judge Dee). In SLSA Annual Conference. 2022.

@proceedings{2249920,
   author = {Štěpáníková, Markéta and Smejkalová, Terezie and Palíšek, Petr},
   booktitle = {SLSA Annual Conference},
   keywords = {ethics; legal ethics; lawyers; judges; social representations; vague legal terms},
   language = {eng},
   title = {Archetypes in a Social Representation of a Dignified Judge (Demonstrated on Judge Dee)},
   url = {https://www.slsa.ac.uk/},
   year = {2022}
}

TY  - CONF
ID  - 2249920
AU  - Štěpáníková, Markéta - Smejkalová, Terezie - Palíšek, Petr
PY  - 2022
TI  - Archetypes in a Social Representation of a Dignified Judge (Demonstrated on Judge Dee)
KW  - ethics
KW  - legal ethics
KW  - lawyers
KW  - judges
KW  - social representations
KW  - vague legal terms
UR  - https://www.slsa.ac.uk/
N2  - Legal ethics is fast becoming a crucial field of legal research even in continental Europe (eg. Sobek 2019). There is a growing body of literature that recognizes the importance of key legal concepts of legal ethics (eg. Phillips 2016). However, many of these concepts are also vague legal terms. As such, they are usually interpreted and applied theoretically. Yet, for example, the content of the term „dignified judge“ is necessarily determined by the social consensus on what is considered „dignified“ so we need to know this consensus to apply the term correctly. In our long-term project, we have chosen to explore legal concepts by methods of studying their social representations. In this part of our project, we use hierarchical evocation (Abric, 2005) for studying the legal concept of „dignified judge“. This method is a simple production task with a free-association basis. In our research, we collected answers from legal professionals with an emphasis on the judiciary. Results of our research showed that a concept of a dignified judge in the Czech Republic consists of several archetypes. These archetypes can be best demonstrated and explained in the example of Judge Dee (van Gulik). It shows that this particular concept is very similar even in very different cultural backgrounds and even both in art and legal academia.
ER  -

ŠTĚPÁNÍKOVÁ, Markéta; Terezie SMEJKALOVÁ a Petr PALÍŠEK. Archetypes in a Social Representation of a Dignified Judge (Demonstrated on Judge Dee). In \textit{SLSA Annual Conference}. 2022.

Přehled o publikaci