Argumentation 2025: Games of Law

M 2025

Argumentation 2025: Games of Law

HAVLÍČEK, Tomáš; Terezie SMEJKALOVÁ; Dennis WASSOUF; Markéta ŠTĚPÁNÍKOVÁ; Hynek VRÁNA et al.

Základní údaje

Originální název

Argumentation 2025: Games of Law

Autoři

HAVLÍČEK, Tomáš ; Terezie SMEJKALOVÁ ; Dennis WASSOUF; Markéta ŠTĚPÁNÍKOVÁ a Hynek VRÁNA

Vydání

2025

Další údaje

Jazyk

angličtina

Typ výsledku

Uspořádání konference

Obor

50500 5.5 Law

Stát vydavatele

Česká republika

Utajení

není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství

Odkazy

Web konference

Označené pro přenos do RIV

Ano

Organizační jednotka

Právnická fakulta

Klíčová slova anglicky

argumentation; conference; performativity in law

Štítky

rivok

Změněno: 2. 2. 2026 17:00, Mgr. et Mgr. Bc. Hynek Vrána

Anotace

V originále

The Argumentation 2025 conference continues the project of creating space for alternative perspectives on law, fostering the emergence of critical jurisprudences that challenge legal orthodoxy. This year’s theme is Games of Law, an invitation to explore how legal practices can be viewed through the metaphor of games and the deeper implications this brings for understanding legal authority, fairness, and justice. The metaphor of games has long been used to analyze social structures, with Johan Huizinga’s concept of homo ludens framing play as an essential aspect of human culture (Huizinga, 1980, 4). Law, too, can be seen as a form of structured play, where participants – judges, lawyers, litigants – operate within defined rules to achieve specific outcomes (Dybowski et al. 2022). Yet, just as in games, legal practices produce both winners and losers, with real-world consequences. Moreover, law, as a system of structured conflict, reflects the inherent tensions and contradictions within human thinking and interaction. Legal practices, like games, are grounded in conflict – both internal and external – an unavoidable part of the human condition. Instead of attempting to eliminate conflict, legal systems strive to manage and transform it, utilizing discursive representations that foster resilience against its destructive forms. These mechanisms not only enable the resolution of disputes but also contribute to broader societal stability and justice. This year’s conference will interrogate how law functions as a game and what this metaphor reveals about power, justice, and the nature of legal authority, while also exploring how the dynamics of conflict and resilience are embedded in legal thinking and practices. How can the game metaphor help us better understand law’s role in addressing societal tensions, managing conflicts, and strengthening communal resilience?

Návaznosti

MUNI/B/1608/2024, interní kód MU

Název: Argumentation 2025

Investor: Masarykova univerzita, Argumentation 2025

Citovat

HAVLÍČEK, Tomáš; Terezie SMEJKALOVÁ; Dennis WASSOUF; Markéta ŠTĚPÁNÍKOVÁ a Hynek VRÁNA. Argumentation 2025: Games of Law. 2025.

@proceedings{2552061,
   author = {Havlíček, Tomáš and Smejkalová, Terezie and Wassouf, Dennis and Štěpáníková, Markéta and Vrána, Hynek},
   keywords = {argumentation; conference; performativity in law},
   language = {eng},
   title = {Argumentation 2025: Games of Law},
   url = {https://argumentation.law.muni.cz/},
   year = {2025}
}

TY  - CONF
ID  - 2552061
AU  - Havlíček, Tomáš - Smejkalová, Terezie - Wassouf, Dennis - Štěpáníková, Markéta - Vrána, Hynek
PY  - 2025
TI  - Argumentation 2025: Games of Law
KW  - argumentation
KW  - conference
KW  - performativity in law
UR  - https://argumentation.law.muni.cz/
N2  - The Argumentation 2025 conference continues the project of creating space for alternative perspectives on law, fostering the emergence of critical jurisprudences that challenge legal orthodoxy. This year’s theme is Games of Law, an invitation to explore how legal practices can be viewed through the metaphor of games and the deeper implications this brings for understanding legal authority, fairness, and justice. The metaphor of games has long been used to analyze social structures, with Johan Huizinga’s concept of homo ludens framing play as an essential aspect of human culture (Huizinga, 1980, 4). Law, too, can be seen as a form of structured play, where participants – judges, lawyers, litigants – operate within defined rules to achieve specific outcomes (Dybowski et al. 2022). Yet, just as in games, legal practices produce both winners and losers, with real-world consequences. Moreover, law, as a system of structured conflict, reflects the inherent tensions and contradictions within human thinking and interaction. Legal practices, like games, are grounded in conflict – both internal and external – an unavoidable part of the human condition. Instead of attempting to eliminate conflict, legal systems strive to manage and transform it, utilizing discursive representations that foster resilience against its destructive forms. These mechanisms not only enable the resolution of disputes but also contribute to broader societal stability and justice. This year’s conference will interrogate how law functions as a game and what this metaphor reveals about power, justice, and the nature of legal authority, while also exploring how the dynamics of conflict and resilience are embedded in legal thinking and practices. How can the game metaphor help us better understand law’s role in addressing societal tensions, managing conflicts, and strengthening communal resilience?
ER  -

HAVLÍČEK, Tomáš; Terezie SMEJKALOVÁ; Dennis WASSOUF; Markéta ŠTĚPÁNÍKOVÁ a Hynek VRÁNA. \textit{Argumentation 2025: Games of Law}. 2025.

Přehled o publikaci