KAMENICKÁ, Renata. Defining explicitation in translation. Sborník prací Filozofické fakulty Brněnské univerzity, Řada anglistická: Brno Studies in English 33. Brno: Masarykova univerzita v Brně, 2007, roč. 33/2007, č. 1, s. 45-57, 155 s. ISSN 1211-1791.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Defining explicitation in translation
Název česky Definice překladové explicitace
Autoři KAMENICKÁ, Renata (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí).
Vydání Sborník prací Filozofické fakulty Brněnské univerzity, Řada anglistická: Brno Studies in English 33, Brno, Masarykova univerzita v Brně, 2007, 1211-1791.
Další údaje
Originální jazyk angličtina
Typ výsledku Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor 60200 6.2 Languages and Literature
Stát vydavatele Česká republika
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
WWW URL
Kód RIV RIV/00216224:14210/07:00033386
Organizační jednotka Filozofická fakulta
Klíčová slova anglicky explicitation; translation; definition; implicitation; specification; generalization; addition; omission
Štítky addition, Definition, explicitation, generalization, implicitation, omission, specification, Translation
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil Změnila: Mgr. Renata Kamenická, Ph.D., učo 458. Změněno: 18. 3. 2012 21:15.
Anotace
The paper discusses problems in defining explicitation (and implicitation) in translation for the purposes of descriptive translation studies, drawing on empirical material and theoretical concepts such as frame theory or figure/ground alignment. Inconsistencies in different approaches taken to the twin concepts in prescriptive theory as well as descriptive research are pointed out. The first main focus of the paper is the connection between explicitation/implicitation and specification/generalization, which is shown to be more complicated than usually described in literature. The second main focus of the paper is the borderline between explicitation/implicitation on the on hand and addition/omission on the other. It is argued that the borderline is intrinsically fuzzy, due to the cognitive mechanisms involved in retrieving implicit information that can be modelled by means of Fillmore's frames, understood as non-accidental networks of salient and less salient contiguities. It is argued that explicitation and implicitation should be treated as prototype categories.
Anotace česky
The paper discusses problems in defining explicitation (and implicitation) in translation for the purposes of descriptive translation studies, drawing on empirical material and theoretical concepts such as frame theory or figure/ground alignment. Inconsistencies in different approaches taken to the twin concepts in prescriptive theory as well as descriptive research are pointed out. The first main focus of the paper is the connection between explicitation/implicitation and specification/generalization, which is shown to be more complicated than usually described in literature. The second main focus of the paper is the borderline between explicitation/implicitation on the on hand and addition/omission on the other. It is argued that the borderline is intrinsically fuzzy, due to the cognitive mechanisms involved in retrieving implicit information that can be modelled by means of Fillmore's frames, understood as non-accidental networks of salient and less salient contiguities. It is argued that explicitation and implicitation should be treated as prototype categories.
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 14. 6. 2024 20:18