Negative Phenomena of Transition and the Impact of Privatization

BURUIANA, Alina. Negative Phenomena of Transition and the Impact of Privatization. In Ekonomika firiem 2004 I. diel. Podnikovohospodarska fakulta v Kosiciach. s. 55-61, 148 s. ISBN 80-225-1879-4. 2004.

Základní údaje

• Originální název: Negative Phenomena of Transition and the Impact of Privatization
• Název anglicky: Negative Phenomena of Transition and the Impact of Privatization
• Autoři: BURUIANA, Alina.
• Vydání: Ekonomika firiem 2004 I. diel, od s. 55-61, 148 s. 2004.
• Nakladatel: Podnikovohospodarska fakulta v Kosiciach

Další údaje

• Typ výsledku: Stať ve sborníku
• Utajení: není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
• Organizační jednotka: Rektorát
• ISBN: 80-225-1879-4
• Klíčová slova anglicky: transition; privatization speed; Czech Republic; Romania; budget constraint; interest groups; corruption; tunnelling; asset-stripping
• Štítky: asset-stripping, budget constraint, corruption, Czech Republic, Interest Groups, privatization speed, Romania, transition, tunnelling

Anotace

Transferring ownership from the state to the private sector in Central and Eastern European countries was considered an essential step of transition towards the market economy. But negative phenomena, which accompanied privatization corruption, asset-stripping, oligarchic entrenchment, tunnelling, etc. proved that interest groups in these post-socialist countries strongly influenced and slowed down the process. This paper tries to analyse the impact of privatization and its speed connected with these negative phenomena, and to offer arguments for a positive view on a quick establishment of property rights. The conclusions are based on the cases of the Czech Republic and Romania compared.

Anotace anglicky

Transferring ownership from the state to the private sector in Central and Eastern European countries was considered an essential step of transition towards the market economy. But negative phenomena, which accompanied privatization corruption, asset-stripping, oligarchic entrenchment, tunnelling, etc. proved that interest groups in these post-socialist countries strongly influenced and slowed down the process. This paper tries to analyse the impact of privatization and its speed connected with these negative phenomena, and to offer arguments for a positive view on a quick establishment of property rights. The conclusions are based on the cases of the Czech Republic and Romania compared.